• Current precious-metal spot prices
  • Gold $4,354.23 -62.24 (-1.41%)
  • Silver $63.03 -2.75 (-4.18%)
  • Platinum $1,724.37 -48.23 (-2.72%)
  • Palladium $1,288.29 -36.41 (-2.75%)
  • updated 4 hours ago
Login
Signup

Who Can’t Touch Your Gold IRA? The IRC 4975 Disqualified Persons Rules Made Simple

By Goldiew Research & Editorial · Last reviewed: May 16, 2026 · 11 min read

Editorial transparency. Goldiew may earn a commission when you use a link on this page to connect with a partner company, at no extra cost to you. That commission never influences our research, ratings, or recommendations. We feature only companies we have researched and consider credible, and because we are not the company itself, we do not set its prices or terms. The information here is educational, not financial or legal advice.

Quick Answer: Who Is a Disqualified Person?

The Short Definition

Under IRC 4975(e)(2), a disqualified person includes the IRA owner, their spouse, lineal ascendants (parents, grandparents), lineal descendants (children, grandchildren), spouses of lineal descendants, any fiduciary of the IRA, anyone who provides services to the IRA, and any entity where a disqualified person owns 50% or more.

Siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins, nieces, and nephews are not disqualified persons under this statute. That distinction matters more than most people realize.

Self-directed IRA rules exist for a specific reason: Congress wanted to prevent retirement account holders from using tax-advantaged funds to benefit themselves or close family members outside the IRS-approved framework. The vehicle for enforcing that goal is IRC 4975, and the critical concept is the “disqualified person.”

Get this wrong and the consequences are severe. A single accidental prohibited transaction can trigger excise taxes, and in the worst case, cause the entire IRA to be treated as distributed in one taxable year. For an account worth $200,000 or more, that is a life-altering tax event. Consult your tax advisor before any transaction involving your SDIRA and a related party.

The Full Legal Definition: IRC 4975(e)(2)

The Internal Revenue Code at section 4975(e)(2) lists who qualifies as a disqualified person. Here is the statutory list, translated into plain language:

  • The IRA fiduciary. The IRA owner is considered a fiduciary of their own IRA. This is the category that catches most people off guard: you are disqualified from transacting with your own IRA outside of approved contributions and distributions.
  • Anyone who provides services to the IRA. If your accountant, attorney, or financial advisor is paid by or through your IRA (rather than by you personally), they can become a disqualified person in that context.
  • An employer of any plan participant or beneficiary. Primarily relevant to employer-sponsored plans, but the rule carries over to SDIRAs in certain structures.
  • An employee organization whose members are covered by the plan. Same employer-plan context.
  • Any entity 50% or more owned or controlled by a disqualified person. If you own 50%+ of an LLC or partnership, that entity is disqualified. Your IRA cannot buy an asset from your own LLC, even at fair market value.
  • Your spouse. Your IRA cannot lend money to or buy assets from your spouse.
  • Ancestors: parents, grandparents, great-grandparents. Direct lineal ascendants are disqualified. A deal between your IRA and your father’s company violates IRC 4975 even if the price is fair and both parties agree.
  • Lineal descendants: children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren. Your IRA cannot sell property to your adult child, even in an arm’s-length transaction at current market value.
  • Spouses of lineal descendants. Your son-in-law and daughter-in-law are disqualified persons. This surprises many IRA holders who assume that in-laws outside their bloodline are neutral parties.

Treasury Regulation 54.4975-6 provides the operational rules for how these prohibitions are applied in practice, including definitions of the “amount involved” for penalty calculation purposes.

Who Is NOT a Disqualified Person: The Common Confusion

The statute is specific about “lineal” descent. It goes straight up (parents, grandparents) and straight down (children, grandchildren). Lateral relatives, including siblings and the extended family beyond that, fall outside the definition. This is one of the most frequently misunderstood aspects of SDIRA compliance.

Disqualified (cannot transact with your IRA)

  • You (the IRA owner)
  • Your spouse
  • Your parents
  • Your grandparents
  • Your children
  • Your grandchildren
  • Your son-in-law or daughter-in-law
  • Any company you own 50%+

Not Disqualified (lateral relatives)

  • Your siblings (brothers, sisters)
  • Your aunts and uncles
  • Your cousins
  • Your nieces and nephews
  • Your parents-in-law
  • Your siblings-in-law
  • Your step-siblings (in most cases)

That means your SDIRA can technically buy a rental property from your brother at fair market value, provided your brother is not also a fiduciary or service provider to your IRA. The transaction still needs to meet fair market value requirements and follow IRA custodian procedures, but it is not automatically prohibited by the disqualified persons rule.

This distinction is not a loophole to exploit. The IRS watches lateral-relative transactions closely because they are sometimes used to circumvent the intent of IRC 4975. But the line is the line, and understanding it accurately matters for planning purposes.

Prohibited Transactions: What Cannot Be Done

IRC 4975(c)(1) defines prohibited transactions as any direct or indirect:

  • Sale, exchange, or lease of property between the IRA and a disqualified person
  • Lending of money or extension of credit between the IRA and a disqualified person
  • Furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between the IRA and a disqualified person
  • Transfer of IRA income or assets to or for the benefit of a disqualified person
  • Act by a disqualified person who is a fiduciary by which they deal with IRA income or assets in their own interest
  • Receipt of any personal consideration by a disqualified person fiduciary from any party dealing with the plan in connection with a transaction involving IRA income or assets

The word “indirect” is important. Structuring a deal to avoid a direct transaction between a disqualified person and the IRA does not automatically make it compliant. If the economic effect is equivalent to a prohibited transaction, the IRS will treat it as one.

Fair market value is not a defense. A prohibited transaction does not become permissible because the price paid was fair. If your IRA sells a property to your daughter at exactly the appraised value, that transaction is still prohibited under IRC 4975(c)(1)(A). The identity of the counterparty, not the price, triggers the rule.

Real-World Examples of Accidental Violations

Most prohibited transactions are not intentional. They result from misunderstanding where the rules apply. Here are the patterns that appear most often in IRS enforcement actions and Tax Court cases:

Example 1, The Home Repair Mistake

An IRA owner holds rental real estate inside their SDIRA. The property needs a new roof. To save money, the owner hires their adult son’s construction company to do the work. The son’s company is paid from IRA funds. Because the son is a lineal descendant (a disqualified person), the IRA just paid a disqualified person for services. That is a prohibited transaction under IRC 4975(c)(1)(C), regardless of whether the price charged was at or below market rate.

Example 2, The Loan to a Child

A parent’s SDIRA holds cash. Their adult child needs a bridge loan for a business venture and asks to borrow from the IRA at a market interest rate. The parent reasons the IRA is earning the same return it would from a CD. The IRS disagrees: lending IRA funds to a lineal descendant is explicitly prohibited under IRC 4975(c)(1)(B), regardless of interest rate or repayment terms.

Example 3, Personal Use of IRA-Owned Property

An IRA owns a vacation home. The IRA holder and their spouse stay at the property for two weeks while conducting “inspection and maintenance.” This personal use of IRA-owned property by disqualified persons (the IRA owner and spouse) constitutes a prohibited transaction. The property’s use cannot benefit the IRA owner directly, even briefly.

Example 4, The 49% Ownership Workaround That Did Not Work

An IRA holder sets up an LLC in which they personally own 49% and their IRA owns 51%. They reason that since they hold less than 50%, their LLC is not a disqualified person. However, if the IRA holder exercises effective control over the LLC as its manager (a fiduciary function), the IRS may still find a prohibited transaction. Control, not just ownership percentage, determines fiduciary status.

Example 5, Sweat Equity on IRA-Owned Assets

An SDIRA buys a commercial property that needs renovation. The IRA owner personally performs the renovation work, reasoning they will not bill their IRA and thus avoid any prohibited transaction. The IRS treats the personal services provided to an IRA-owned asset as a transaction between a disqualified person and the IRA. The “free” labor is the consideration, not the absence of an invoice.

The Penalties: Excise Tax and IRA Disqualification

Penalties under IRC 4975 follow a three-stage escalation structure:

15% Initial excise tax

Assessed on the “amount involved” in the prohibited transaction, per year it remains uncorrected.

100% Correction failure tax

Applies if the transaction is not corrected within the taxable period. Effectively eliminates any financial benefit from the transaction.

Full distribution IRA owner involvement

Per IRC 408(e)(2), the entire IRA is treated as distributed as of January 1 of the year the prohibited transaction occurred.

That third outcome is the one with the most severe consequences. If you, as the IRA owner (not just a third-party disqualified person), engage in a prohibited transaction, the IRS does not penalize just the amount of the transaction. The entire IRA balance, as of January 1 of that tax year, is treated as taxable income. For a traditional IRA, that full amount becomes income in the year of the violation. On a $350,000 account, that creates substantial federal and state tax liability in a single year, plus the 10% early distribution penalty if you are under 59-1/2.

Consult a qualified tax attorney before any arrangement where you, as the IRA owner, are personally involved in a transaction connected to your SDIRA assets. The consequences are not proportional to the size of the individual transaction.

Precious Metals vs. Real Estate: Different Risk Profiles

The disqualified persons rules apply equally to all self-directed IRA assets, including gold and silver. But in practice, precious metals SDIRAs carry much lower inherent risk of triggering prohibited transactions than real estate SDIRAs.

A gold IRA works as follows: you fund the account, your custodian purchases IRS-approved bullion on your behalf, and the metals go directly to an IRS-approved depository. You do not handle the metals. You do not store them at home. You do not manage them. The transaction chain goes from custodian to approved dealer to approved depository. None of those parties are typically your relatives or businesses you own.

Real estate is different. A property requires maintenance, repair, management, financing, and sometimes development. All of those activities involve counterparties, and those counterparties can inadvertently become disqualified persons. A property manager who is also your son, a plumber who is your nephew’s company, a lender who is your business partner: each of these arrangements can create a prohibited transaction without anyone intending to break any rules.

For gold IRA holders, the disqualified persons risk is primarily theoretical in normal operation. The main scenarios where it could arise:

  • Purchasing gold from a coin dealer that you own 50%+ (disqualified entity)
  • Selling metals from your IRA to a family member at below-market value
  • Borrowing against or pledging your gold IRA as collateral for a personal loan
  • Attempting to take personal possession of IRA-owned metals (separately prohibited under IRS Publication 590-A home storage rules)

If you hold your gold IRA through a legitimate custodian who purchases from approved dealers and ships to an approved depository, none of these scenarios arise in normal operation. The custodian structure removes the counterparty decisions from your hands entirely.

Choosing a custodian that handles all purchases and storage through IRS-approved channels is the most practical compliance step for gold IRA holders. It separates you from the transaction chain and eliminates most of the prohibited-transaction risk that comes with self-directed real estate accounts. Augusta Precious Metals works through a qualified self-directed IRA custodian and approved depositories, following their Education-First process: Learn, Talk, Decide. Get Augusta’s free Gold IRA guide and review how their custodian structure works before deciding if it fits your situation. Consult your tax advisor about the right custodian structure for your circumstances.

How to Stay Compliant with Your Self-Directed IRA

Four practices cover most of the risk:

Work through your custodian for every transaction. A qualified SDIRA custodian processes all purchases, sales, and transfers according to IRS rules. They are not infallible, but they are trained to flag problematic structures before they become prohibited transactions. Bypassing the custodian to speed up a deal is how most violations happen.

Never provide services to your IRA-owned assets. This includes management, maintenance, legal work, bookkeeping, or any other service for which the market would charge a fee. If the asset needs work, hire an unrelated third party and pay them from IRA funds through the custodian.

Map every counterparty against the IRC 4975(e)(2) list before any transaction. Before your IRA buys from, sells to, lends to, or hires anyone, check whether that party falls within the disqualified persons definition. Write it down. Keep documentation of your analysis.

Get a qualified opinion before any complex structure. Checkbook-control IRA LLCs, multi-investor SDIRA arrangements, and any structure where you have significant operational control over IRA assets warrant a written opinion from a tax attorney familiar with ERISA and IRC 4975 before you proceed. We are not financial advisors. Consult a licensed advisor before making retirement decisions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can my brother buy assets from my SDIRA?

Siblings are not listed in IRC 4975(e)(2) as disqualified persons. A transaction between your SDIRA and your brother is not automatically prohibited by the disqualified persons rule. The transaction still needs to be at fair market value, handled through your custodian, and free of any arrangement by which you receive an indirect personal benefit. If your brother also provides services to your IRA or acts as its fiduciary, that separate role may disqualify him in that context.

Are my parents-in-law disqualified persons?

No. IRC 4975(e)(2) specifies ancestors and lineal descendants of the IRA owner, plus spouses of lineal descendants. Parents-in-law are your spouse’s parents, not your ancestors. They fall outside the disqualified persons definition. However, your spouse (their child) is a disqualified person, so any arrangement where your parents-in-law are acting as intermediaries for your spouse’s benefit would likely be scrutinized by the IRS.

What happens if I accidentally trigger a prohibited transaction?

Contact a qualified tax attorney immediately. In some cases, prompt correction within the taxable period can limit the excise tax to 15% of the amount involved rather than 100%. If the prohibited transaction involved you personally as the IRA owner (rather than a third-party disqualified person), the consequences are more severe: the entire IRA is treated as distributed as of January 1 of that year under IRC 408(e)(2). A tax attorney should review any situation where you suspect a prohibited transaction has occurred. Consult your tax advisor for your specific situation.

Can my nephew purchase an asset from my SDIRA?

Nephews are not disqualified persons under IRC 4975(e)(2). You should still process the transaction through your custodian at fair market value, with proper documentation, and without any arrangement by which you receive a personal benefit from the sale. Even non-disqualified-person transactions can be challenged by the IRS if the structure suggests self-dealing that is not captured by the literal statutory definition.

Does the disqualified person rule apply to Roth SDIRAs the same way as traditional SDIRAs?

Yes. IRC 4975 applies to both traditional and Roth IRAs. The prohibited transaction rules, the disqualified person definitions, and the excise tax structure are identical regardless of IRA type. The tax consequences of a full distribution differ (Roth contributions come out tax-free, but earnings may be taxable and subject to penalty depending on your situation), but the compliance framework is the same. Consult your tax advisor for your specific situation.

Can I store IRA-owned gold at home?

No. IRS Publication 590-A requires that IRA assets be held by a qualified trustee or custodian, and IRS-approved precious metals must be stored at an approved depository. Schemes marketed as “home storage gold IRAs” have been the subject of IRS enforcement actions. Taking personal possession of IRA-owned metals is treated as a taxable distribution, triggering income tax and potentially the 10% early withdrawal penalty if you are under 59-1/2. Consult your tax advisor before any arrangement involving physical access to IRA metals.

What is the “amount involved” for purposes of the 15% excise tax?

Treasury Regulation 54.4975-6 defines “amount involved” as the greater of the money and fair market value of the property given or received in the prohibited transaction. For loans, it is the greater of the interest paid or the fair market value of the use of the money for the period. The 15% excise tax is assessed on this amount for each year (or part of a year) the prohibited transaction remains uncorrected.

Can I correct a prohibited transaction to avoid the full 100% penalty?

Correction within the “taxable period” limits the penalty to the initial 15% excise tax. The taxable period runs from the date of the prohibited transaction through the earlier of: the date the IRS assesses the tax, or the date of correction. If the IRS has already sent a notice of deficiency before you correct, the 100% additional tax applies. Acting quickly with qualified legal advice gives you the best chance of limiting the consequences. Note that correction for transactions involving the IRA owner personally may not prevent the IRA from being treated as fully distributed under IRC 408(e)(2). Consult your tax advisor for your specific situation.

This guide is reviewed and updated quarterly to reflect changes in IRS rules, partner offers, and company policies. For questions, corrections, or to report inaccuracies, contact our editorial team via the contact page.

Last reviewed: May 16, 2026

editorial team
Goldiew Research & Editorial
Independent research on gold, jewelry, and precious metals, from selling and loans to gold IRAs. About our methodology →

Saving favorites is only available to logged-in users. Please log in or sign up to continue.

By continuing with Google you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.
or log in with email

🔒❔ Forgot your password? Reset it here.

Liking reviews is for logged-in users: please log in or sign up to continue.

By continuing with Google you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.
or log in with email

🔒❔ Forgot your password? Reset it here.

Login

By continuing with Google you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.
or log in with email

🖐️➡ No account yet? Sign up here.

🔒❔ Forgot your password? Reset it here.